Local Conflicts and Bipolar Stability: When the Tail Wags the Dog
6 pages · PDF · 17 September 2025 · Licensed single-user copy, watermarked to the buyer
€299 excl. VAT — EU VAT calculated at checkout (VAT ID accepted for reverse charge); invoice issued after payment
One click to Stripe — guest checkout, no account. Your download appears on the confirmation page and arrives by e-mail right after payment (link valid 72 hours, up to 5 downloads).
See a sample before you buy. Read the full public summary of this report — free, no account needed: Read the free sample →
Not deciding today? Leave your e-mail and we will send you the free public summary of this report and answer any question before you buy. Optional — the purchase above works without it.
Sold by STRONCATURE S.R.L. (VAT IT05960160652) · Secure checkout by Stripe · Instant watermarked PDF · EU invoice issued after payment.
About this report
One of the most significant interpretive issues of the Cold War concerns the nature of peripheral conflicts that marked the post-1945 international order. The label of “proxy wars” has become conventional to describe conflicts such as Korea, Vietnam, the Middle East, and Afghanistan.
According to this view, the superpowers deliberately used local theatres as indirect instruments to test one another’s strength while avoiding direct confrontation. Yet this perspective risks oversimplifying historical dynamics that were in fact more complex.
Key questions this report answers
- Why does the report question the conventional 'proxy wars' label applied to conflicts such as Korea, Vietnam, the Middle East, and Afghanistan?
- How does the view that superpowers deliberately used local theatres as indirect instruments risk oversimplifying more complex historical dynamics?
- In what sense could peripheral conflicts of the post-1945 order see the tail wag the dog rather than superpowers fully controlling events?
- What does a more complex reading of local conflicts reveal about the relationship between bipolar stability and peripheral escalation?
Who it's for
Strategy, corporate-development and investment teams that need an ecosystem-level view — budgets, industrial capacity and technology landscapes — before committing capital or capacity.
Related reports
Methodology, format & delivery
DFM reports are built from primary and official sources — TED procurement notices, CORDIS and the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, EIB operations, the NATO Innovation Fund portfolio, SIPRI data, official budget documents and company disclosures — read together with the underlying legal texts. Sources are cited in the document; it reflects them as of its publication date (17 September 2025). You receive a 6-page PDF, watermarked to you on every page, delivered on the confirmation page and by e-mail immediately after checkout (personal link valid 72 hours, up to 5 downloads). Guest checkout, single-user licence — Terms of Sale.
Related on DFM
More Strategic reports · Free summary of this report · All reports
For your role
Investors
Investment intelligence on this company or segment
Request an investment-intelligence brief →SMEs & scale-ups
Position your capability with European programmes
Request a positioning & funding-eligibility check →Universities & research
Technology scouting and multi-seat access for your group
Request technology scouting / team access →Legal & compliance
Eligibility, export-control and regulatory analysis
Request a compliance analysis →Institutional & team access. Labs, primes and universities can equip a whole desk — multi-seat / institutional licensing. Request team / institutional access →
Follow Local Conflicts and Bipolar Stability: When the Tail Wags the Dog
Get notified by email when DFM publishes new reports on this topic. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Prefer unlimited access?
Prefer unlimited access? Every report like this is included in the DFM Analysis subscription. See plans →