DFM Platform

Capability

Capturing Asia-Pacific Defense Growth: A Thematic ETF Proposal

Capturing Asia-Pacific Defense Growth: a Thematic ETF Proposal: what does it mean for European defence capital allocation and valuations?

Geopolitical tensions in the Indo-Pacific – especially U.S.–China rivalry and North Korea’s provocations – have prompted a wave of defense rearmament among Asia-Pacific democracies.

This public thread presents the concise analytical answer. The complete evidence, source base and assessment are available below.

Part of our Global Defence Institutions and Policy, Procurement & Institutions coverage →

Original DFM publication · DFM Analysis report · 2025-06-12

Geopolitical tensions in the Indo-Pacific – especially U.S.–China rivalry and North Korea’s provocations – have prompted a wave of defense rearmament among Asia-Pacific democracies. U.S. officials now openly push regional allies to boost military spending in order to deter China. At the Shangri-La defense forum in May 2025, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth warned that “the threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,” and he urged Asian partners to “step up” their own defense budgets. Similarly, Washington’s review of the AUKUS security pact explicitly cites the need for allies to “step up fully to do their part for collective defense”.

These signals echo the post‑Ukraine pattern in Europe, where U.S. pressure and a clear threat perception drove NATO members to sharply raise defense budgets (EU military spending rose to ~1.3% of GDP in 2023 and hit NATO’s 2% guideline in 2024). By analogy, U.S. strategy seems aimed at encouraging Japan, South Korea and Australia to likewise expand their defense outlays as a deterrent and burden‑sharing measure. U.S. policymakers have begun explicitly lobbying key Asia‑Pacific allies on spending. In May 2025, Hegseth personally asked Australia to raise its defense spending, reportedly to around 3–3.5% of GDP.

Prime Minister Albanese responded that Australia will increase spending to about 2.4% by the end of his term (up from about 2.2% in 2025) and that $50 billion has already been pledged over a decade. Japan and South Korea have likewise signaled major defense expansions. In late 2024 Japan announced its largest-ever budget (roughly $59 billion for FY2025) and reaffirmed a plan to double spending to 2% of GDP by 2027. North Korea’s missile tests and China’s military buildup have driven Seoul to propose its own record budget (about 61.6 trillion won, ~$46 billion, for 2025 – a 3.5% increase) aimed at beefing up air defenses and long-range strike systems.

In short, a strategic “arms race” of democratic allies appears to be emerging – with Washington’s encouragement – paralleling Europe’s post‑Ukraine build-up.

Key takeaways

  • Prime Minister Albanese responded that Australia will increase spending to about 2.4% by the end of his term (up from about 2.2% in 2025) and that $50 billion has already been pledged over a decade.
  • In short, a strategic “arms race” of democratic allies appears to be emerging – with Washington’s encouragement – paralleling Europe’s post‑Ukraine build-up.
  • Japan and South Korea have likewise signaled major defense expansions.

Choose how to continue

Go deeper on this question

Keep getting the analysis

DFM publishes new defence-finance analysis every week.

We store your e-mail only to send these. Nothing else. Privacy.

Original DFM analysis

Capturing Asia-Pacific Defense Growth: A Thematic ETF Proposal

Type DFM Analysis report
Published 2025-06-12
Access

The publication details above identify the source used for this public thread.

FAQ

What is Capturing Asia-Pacific Defense Growth: A Thematic ETF Proposal?

These signals echo the post‑Ukraine pattern in Europe, where U.S.

Why does Capturing Asia-Pacific Defense Growth: A Thematic ETF Proposal matter for European defence?

pressure and a clear threat perception drove NATO members to sharply raise defense budgets (EU military spending rose to ~1.3% of GDP in 2023 and hit NATO’s 2% guideline in 2024).

Topics Strategic Autonomy #strategic-autonomy

Related DFM Platform threads

Explore this category Strategic Autonomy

Professional requests (internal interest signal — not a marketplace; nothing is charged or promised)

Defence Finance Monitor is an analytical and informational product. It does not constitute investment advice, financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell securities. Subscriptions run on DFM Analysis. Payments for Professional Packs are processed securely by Stripe at checkout.