From US Drawdown to European Capability Replacement
Italy, NATO burden reallocation and the financial architecture of strategic autonomy.
17 pages · PDF · 23 May 2026 · Licensed single-user copy, watermarked to the buyer
€299 excl. VAT — EU VAT calculated at checkout (VAT ID accepted for reverse charge); invoice issued after payment
One click to Stripe — guest checkout, no account. Your download appears on the confirmation page and arrives by e-mail right after payment (link valid 72 hours, up to 5 downloads).
About this report
Europe’s defence debate is entering a more operational phase. The issue is no longer only whether European states should spend more, but whether they can replace the high-end conventional enablers that the United States has historically supplied inside NATO. A gradual U.S.
force adjustment in Europe, even without a confirmed Italy-specific withdrawal order, changes the planning baseline for European governments, defence industries and capital providers. Italy is central to this problem because its territory hosts a dense combination of U.S. and NATO functions across airpower, logistics, Mediterranean naval command, C4I, airborne response and southern-flank power projection.
Key questions this report answers
- What high-end conventional enablers has the United States historically supplied inside NATO that Europe must now consider replacing?
- How does a gradual U.S. force adjustment change the planning baseline for European governments, industries and capital providers?
- Why is Italy the most consequential southern-flank test case for capability replacement across airpower, logistics and C4I?
- What funding architecture, industry and market consequences follow for European strategic autonomy?
Inside this report
- Scope and evidentiary status
- What is actually changing in the Atlantic division of labour
- The capability replacement problem behind the slogan of strategic autonomy
- Italy as the most consequential southern-flank test case
- The real funding architecture of strategic autonomy
- Capital, industry and market consequences
- What can be concluded with confidence
- Open questions and limits
Who it's for
Strategy, corporate-development and investment teams that need an ecosystem-level view — budgets, industrial capacity and technology landscapes — before committing capital or capacity.
Methodology & sources
DFM reports are built from primary and official sources — TED procurement notices, CORDIS and the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, EIB operations, the NATO Innovation Fund portfolio, SIPRI data, official budget documents and company disclosures — read together with the underlying legal texts. Sources are cited in the document; the report reflects them as of its publication date (23 May 2026).
Format & delivery
17-page PDF, watermarked to you (name, e-mail, order number on every page). Delivered immediately after checkout on the confirmation page and by e-mail; the personal link is valid for 72 hours and up to 5 downloads (re-issued on request). Guest checkout — no account required. Single-user licence: see the Terms of Sale.
The full analysis, not the summary
The public briefing linked above tells you what this report found; the report itself shows the full evidence and reasoning behind it, section by section. It is the complete, dated document from the DFM research desk — sources cited, delivered as a licensed PDF you can keep and cite in your own work.
Related on DFM
More Strategic reports · Free summary of this report · All reports
Prefer unlimited access?
Prefer unlimited access? Every report like this is included in the DFM Analysis subscription. See plans →