DFM Platform

Capability

NATO Pushes For Long-Range Missiles Amid Rising Russian Threat

NATO Pushes for Long-Range Missiles Amid Rising Russian Threat: what capability does it address, and how mature is it?

NATO’s reliance on the United States for long-range missile capabilities has become a critical concern as Russia expands its arsenal. According to U.S. Major General John Rafferty, Moscow’s growing investment…

This public thread presents the concise analytical answer. The complete evidence, source base and assessment are available below.

Part of our Global Defence Institutions and Policy, Procurement & Institutions coverage →

Original DFM publication · DFM Analysis report · 2025-07-15

NATO’s reliance on the United States for long-range missile capabilities has become a critical concern as Russia expands its arsenal. According to U.S. Major General John Rafferty, Moscow’s growing investment in long-range rockets and advanced air defences highlights the urgent need for NATO to increase its own capacity. Speaking from a military base in Wiesbaden, Germany, Rafferty stressed that Russia's armed forces are now larger and better equipped than at the start of the war in Ukraine, and that credible deterrence will require significant reinforcement of long-range strike systems within the alliance. The war in Ukraine has demonstrated the decisive role of long-range precision weapons in targeting enemy infrastructure deep behind the front lines.

Russia’s continued use of these systems has underscored a strategic imbalance, with Kyiv and its European backers often outmatched in range and volume. Currently, the United States is estimated to provide about 90 percent of NATO’s long-range missile capabilities. European systems, such as the Storm Shadow, Scalp, and Taurus cruise missiles, remain limited in both range and quantity, placing greater pressure on U.S. contributions to maintain credible deterrence. To address this gap, the United States plans to deploy long-range missiles on European territory beginning in 2026.

The initiative, agreed under the Biden administration, includes the deployment of Tomahawk cruise missiles and the hypersonic Dark Eagle system. However, with a change in U.S. leadership, questions have emerged in Berlin about the continuity of the plan. German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius is expected to seek assurances from U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth about whether the prior agreement will be honoured by the Trump administration. Clarity on this point is seen as essential for European planning and alliance cohesion.

Meanwhile, several European countries are initiating their own programmes to reduce dependence on American capabilities. The European Long-Range Strike Approach (ELSA), which includes France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Britain, and Sweden, is aimed at developing new ground-launched missiles with extended reach.

Key takeaways

  • The initiative, agreed under the Biden administration, includes the deployment of Tomahawk cruise missiles and the hypersonic Dark Eagle system.
  • Meanwhile, several European countries are initiating their own programmes to reduce dependence on American capabilities.
  • Currently, the United States is estimated to provide about 90 percent of NATO’s long-range missile capabilities.

Choose how to continue

Go deeper on this question

Keep getting the analysis

DFM publishes new defence-finance analysis every week.

We store your e-mail only to send these. Nothing else. Privacy.

Original DFM analysis

NATO Pushes For Long-Range Missiles Amid Rising Russian Threat

Type DFM Analysis report
Published 2025-07-15
Access

The publication details above identify the source used for this public thread.

FAQ

What is NATO Pushes For Long-Range Missiles Amid Rising Russian Threat?

Russia’s continued use of these systems has underscored a strategic imbalance, with Kyiv and its European backers often outmatched in range and volume.

Why does NATO Pushes For Long-Range Missiles Amid Rising Russian Threat matter for European defence?

European systems, such as the Storm Shadow, Scalp, and Taurus cruise missiles, remain limited in both range and quantity, placing greater pressure on U.S.

Topics Strategic Autonomy #strategic-autonomy

Related DFM Platform threads

Explore this category Strategic Autonomy

Explore related themes European Defence-Industrial Base

Professional requests (internal interest signal — not a marketplace; nothing is charged or promised)

Defence Finance Monitor is an analytical and informational product. It does not constitute investment advice, financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell securities. Subscriptions run on DFM Analysis. Payments for Professional Packs are processed securely by Stripe at checkout.