Capability
Major Asset Managers And Institutional Investors Are Slowly Lifting Self-imposed Bans On Defence Investments, Increasing
Major Asset Managers and Institutional Investors Are Slowly Lifting Self-imposed Bans on Defence Investments, Increasing: what does it mean for European defence capital allocation and valuations?
A Reuters survey in March found that out of Europe’s 10 largest asset management groups, several have begun formal reviews to loosen or remove defence exclusions .
This public thread presents the concise analytical answer. The complete evidence, source base and assessment are available below.
Part of our Investors & Capital Allocators and Financial Supply-Side coverage →
Original DFM publication · DFM Analysis report · 2025-03-13
A Reuters survey in March found that out of Europe’s 10 largest asset management groups, several have begun formal reviews to loosen or remove defence exclusions . UBS AM’s review was public; Allianz Global Investors also indicated it’s reconsidering its policies (though claimed timing was coincidental). Others like Amundi and Schroders said their exclusion policies remain unchanged for now, but even they have launched or promoted defence-themed funds (Amundi’s new ETF, for instance). Notably, some managers that were earlier adopters of strict ESG stances are shifting: Mirova (Natixis’ sustainable investment arm), which traditionally shunned defence, said Europe’s security situation “compelled [it] to reconsider” its cautious stance, balancing ethical concerns with the need for robust defence.
In practice, institutional portfolios are already tilting towards defence. Data shows the average weighting of European funds to aerospace & defence stocks rose to 1.1% in 2023 from 0.7% in 2021. That may sound small, but across trillions of euros, it’s a significant reallocation of capital into the sector. Some pension funds have directly announced changes: e.g., a large Dutch pension investor (PME) removed its blanket ban on defence companies in 2022, and others in Scandinavia have followed suit, at least partially.
The political wind is at their backs – in the UK, lawmakers urged investors to support the domestic defence industry as patriotic duty, and France’s finance ministry has quietly encouraged banks and insurers to drop strict exclusionary policies. This gradual thaw among asset owners is pivotal because historically, even when defence stocks were cheap, many big funds simply could not buy them due to ESG mandates. Now, with mandates evolving, a wall of institutional money can enter the space. In the near term, this provides additional demand that can support share prices and lower yields on defence company bonds.
Over the medium term, it means defence firms can consider larger equity or debt issuances (for expansion or M&A) without fear of lacking buyers.
Key takeaways
- The political wind is at their backs – in the UK, lawmakers urged investors to support the domestic defence industry as patriotic duty…
- Over the medium term, it means defence firms can consider larger equity or debt issuances (for expansion or M&A) without fear of lacking buyers.
- Data shows the average weighting of European funds to aerospace & defence stocks rose to 1.1% in 2023 from 0.7% in 2021.
Choose how to continue
Go deeper on this question
Keep getting the analysis
DFM publishes new defence-finance analysis every week.
Original DFM analysis
Major Asset Managers And Institutional Investors Are Slowly Lifting Self-imposed Bans On Defence Investments, Increasing
The publication details above identify the source used for this public thread.
FAQ
What is Major Asset Managers And Institutional Investors Are Slowly Lifting Self-imposed Bans On Defence Investments, Increasing?
UBS AM’s review was public; Allianz Global Investors also indicated it’s reconsidering its policies (though claimed timing was coincidental).
Why does Major Asset Managers And Institutional Investors Are Slowly Lifting Self-imposed Bans On Defence Investments, Increasing matter for European defence?
In practice, institutional portfolios are already tilting towards defence.
Related DFM Platform threads
Explore this category Strategic Autonomy
Professional requests (internal interest signal — not a marketplace; nothing is charged or promised)
See Professional & Institutional Access — plans, group/institutional seats and contact →
Defence Finance Monitor is an analytical and informational product. It does not constitute investment advice, financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell securities. Subscriptions run on DFM Analysis. Payments for Professional Packs are processed securely by Stripe at checkout.