The Evolving Integration of Defense in the EU’s ESG Framework
19 pages · PDF · 27 May 2025 · Licensed single-user copy, watermarked to the buyer
€299 excl. VAT — EU VAT calculated at checkout (VAT ID accepted for reverse charge); invoice issued after payment
One click to Stripe — guest checkout, no account. Your download appears on the confirmation page and arrives by e-mail right after payment (link valid 72 hours, up to 5 downloads).
About this report
In the wake of growing geopolitical instability – most notably the war in Ukraine – European policymakers and investors are rethinking the relationship between defense and sustainable finance. Traditionally, weapons manufacturing and defense companies have been viewed as ethically incompatible with ESG goals, leading many ESG funds to exclude them entirely.
However, this stance is shifting under political pressure to bolster Europe’s security and strategic autonomy. High-level EU initiatives (such as President Ursula von der Leyen’s ReArm Europe plan to mobilize up to €800 billion for defense) underscore the new priority on funding the defense sector.
Key questions this report answers
- How is defence being integrated into the EU's ESG framework through SFDR interpretation and the 2025 EU Social Taxonomy's 'non-problematic' defence?
- How do ESG benchmark reforms, such as Euronext's 'Energy, Security & Geostrategy', change the treatment of defence firms?
- What are the implications for asset managers, ETF providers and defence companies' ESG reporting and repositioning?
- What political and financial drivers, including the ReArm Europe plan to mobilise up to EUR 800 billion, are shifting ESG's stance on defence?
Inside this report
- Introduction
- SFDR and Defense: Current State of Play
- The 2025 EU Social Taxonomy and “Non-Problematic” Defense
- ESG Benchmarks Overhaul: Euronext’s “Energy, Security & Geostrategy”
- Implications for Asset Managers and ETF Providers
- European Defense Companies: Repositioning and ESG Reporting
- The Role of ESG Ratings and Agencies
- Political and Financial Drivers of the Shift
- Conclusion
Who it's for
Bid, compliance and advisory teams working with EU defence funding and procurement instruments, and the counsel who support them.
Related reports
Methodology, format & delivery
DFM reports are built from primary and official sources — TED procurement notices, CORDIS and the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, EIB operations, the NATO Innovation Fund portfolio, SIPRI data, official budget documents and company disclosures — read together with the underlying legal texts. Sources are cited in the document; it reflects them as of its publication date (27 May 2025). You receive a 19-page PDF, watermarked to you on every page, delivered on the confirmation page and by e-mail immediately after checkout (personal link valid 72 hours, up to 5 downloads). Guest checkout, single-user licence — Terms of Sale.
Related on DFM
More Operational reports · All reports
Prefer unlimited access?
Prefer unlimited access? Every report like this is included in the DFM Analysis subscription. See plans →