European Defence Cooperation after the Ottawa Withdrawals
Who may lawfully supply, finance and insure a capability that five European states have chosen and eight others still prohibit
21 pages · PDF · Analysis as of 19 September 2026
€299 excl. VAT
Invoice with VAT ID · EU reverse charge automatic · watermarked single-user copy · instant download
What you'll learn
- A government that decides to restore a weapon to its inventory acquires, at most, permission for itself.
- It does not acquire an engineer in another country, a licence to a patent held abroad, a credit line from a bank supervised elsewhere, or a surety bond from an insurer whose own rules were written without reference to its decision.
- Between 27 December 2025 and 20 February 2026 five European states ceased to be bound by the prohibition on antipersonnel mines, while the states that host much of Europe’s defence-industrial base remained bound by it.
A contents-paged report: a company's structure, portfolio, programme participation and funding record — or a market question measured with a stated method and full bibliography. Use it to check a counterparty or a claim before committing time or budget.
≈ $331 — charged in euros; ECB reference rate.
EU VAT calculated at checkout; invoice issued after payment. One click to Stripe — guest checkout, no account. Download on the confirmation page and by e-mail (72 hours, up to 5 downloads).
Sold by STRONCATURE S.R.L. (VAT IT05960160652) · Prepared by the DFM research desk — editor: Nunzio Mastrolia.
Follow European Defence Cooperation after the Ottawa Withdrawals — free alerts: new calls, deadline changes, updated editions
What this report establishes
“European Defence Cooperation after the Ottawa Withdrawals” is a sourced, structured Defence Finance Monitor analysis, closed on 19 September 2026. It establishes what is at stake, who the actors are and what it means for European defence funding and industry — drawn only from primary and official sources. This page summarises what the 21-page report determines; the figures, the evidence and the conclusions are in the report itself.
Who it's for
Strategy, corporate-development and investment teams that need an ecosystem-level view — budgets, industrial capacity and technology landscapes — before committing capital or capacity.
Key questions this report answers
- What is the central argument of “European Defence Cooperation after the Ottawa Withdrawals”, and why does it matter for European defence and dual-use markets?
- How does the analysis address the divergence, and what it left standing?
- How does the analysis address what the withdrawing states changed, and what they did not?
- What does this mean for European defence funding, procurement and investment decisions?
Inside this report
- The divergence, and what it left standing
- What the withdrawing states changed, and what they did not
- The prohibitions that reach outward
- Finance and insurance are different objects, and their perimeters are narrower t
- The European framework, and how it moved during the period
- What is actually being built, and by whom
- Conclusion
Sample page
One full page from the report, exactly as delivered (21 pages in total).
Sources
This report is built only from primary and official sources, cited in the document as of 19 September 2026 — 32 distinct sources including allianz.com, allianzgi.com, api.sejm.gov.pl, apminebanconvention.org, auswaertiges-amt.de, bancaditalia.it, bundestag.de, clusterconvention.org, data.consilium.europa.eu, defence24.pl, dserver.bundestag.de, e-seimas.lrs.lt, eimin.lrv.lt, eur-lex.europa.eu, finlex.fi, gazzettaufficiale.it, gov.pl, gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk, icrc.org, legislation.gov.uk, lrt.lt, m.likumi.lv, maavoimat.fi, mod.gov.lv, normattiva.it, questions-statements.parliament.uk, riigikogu.ee, treaties.un.org, valtioneuvosto.fi, wnp.pl, zurich.com. The source material itself is in the report, not on this page.
Related reports
- The Risk the State Keeps — pages · €
- Household Capital and the Public Anchor in Bpifrance Défense — pages · €
- What three British retirements show about when withdrawal releases money — pages · €
- Exosens’ Debt Terms and European Defence-Critical Capacity — pages · €
- Compensation, Contractual Precedence and Financial Exposure in France, Sweden and the Union Framework — pages · €
- Compulsory Screening, Twenty-seven Separate Decisions — pages · €
Related reports
Methodology, format & delivery
DFM reports are built from primary and official sources — TED procurement notices, CORDIS and the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, EIB operations, the NATO Innovation Fund portfolio, SIPRI data, official budget documents and company disclosures — read together with the underlying legal texts. Sources are cited in the document; it reflects them as of its publication date (19 September 2026). You receive a 21-page report (PDF), watermarked to you on every page, delivered on the confirmation page and by e-mail immediately after checkout (personal link valid 72 hours, up to 5 downloads). Guest checkout, single-user licence — Terms of Sale.
Related on DFM
More Strategic reports · All reports
For your role
Investors
Investment intelligence on this company or segment
Request an investment-intelligence brief →SMEs & scale-ups
Position your capability with European programmes
Request a positioning & funding-eligibility check →Universities & research
Technology scouting and multi-seat access for your group
Request technology scouting / team access →Legal & compliance
Eligibility, export-control and regulatory analysis
Request a compliance analysis →Institutional & team access. Labs, primes and universities can equip a whole desk — multi-seat / institutional licensing. Request team / institutional access →
Stay on this subject
One alert when something moves: new calls, deadline changes, updated editions and related reports.
Follow — free alerts